Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. Redevco Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On August 26, 1981, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) mailed to respondent a notice that its dispute with petitioner would be the subject of an arbitration hearing to be held on October 2, 1981. On two subsequent occasions, the AAA again reminded respondent, by letters dated September 25 and September 30, 1981, that the hearing would proceed on October 2 as scheduled.
Nevertheless, respondent failed to appear at the hearing without requesting either an adjournment or a continuance. Having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United Nations Development Corp. v. Norkin Plumbing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Silverstein v. MinkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration Between PPX Enterprises, Inc. & MusicaliNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brady v. Williams Capital Group, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Arbitration between Royal Chrysler-Oneonta, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Institute of International Education & Permanent Mission of Spain to United NationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between Faberge, Inc. & Felsway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Birnbaum v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.