Beaufort County Lumber Co. v. Drainage Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, tried before Connor, J'., and a jury, at February Civil Term, 1917, of RobesoN. On motion by defendants, made in apt time, there was judgment as of nonsuit, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
A perusal of the record will disclose that the drainage district in question has been duly and regularly established, pursuant to the provisions of the statute applicable (chapter 442, Laws 1909; chapter 67, Laws 1911) ; that the plaintiffs and all others owning lands or timber interests within the defined area have been duly notified, both of the hearing on the intermediate and final reports; that plaintiff company not only had actual notice, but attended the hearings, certainly the final one, and filed exceptions to the report, insisting on a reduction of the amount assessed against it, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hobgood v. HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Meares v. Commissioners of the Town of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
- Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Duval v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Newby & White v. Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spencer v. . WillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- O'Neal v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Newton v. . ChasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Shelton v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Ingram v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.