In re the Marriage of Fuernsteiner-Perin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
In this dissolution of marriage proceeding under ORS chapter 107, husband appeals the trial court’s judgment that provided for an unequal distribution of marital property to husband and wife. On appeal, husband argues that the property division was not “just and proper” under the circumstances and that the trial court should have awarded husband and wife an equal share of the marital assets. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and modify the judgment.
Husband and wife were married for 14 years and have no children together. When the marriage began, wife owned a house in Eugene, which she had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Mabon v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Marriage of PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hostetler v. HostetlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Matter of Marriage of ProctorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010