In re the Marriage of Davis

Husband appeals a general judgment of dissolution, challenging the trial court’s division of the parties’ property. He argues that the trial court erred in determining that he did not rebut the presumption of equal contribution regarding money that he had received from a personal injury settlement. See ORS 107.105(l)(f) (describing the presumption of equal contribution).1 We conclude that the trial court’s determination that husband failed to rebut the presumption of equal contribution was based on a misapplication of ORS 107.105(1) (f) and relevant case law. Accordingly, we vacate the…