Legal Opinion

Barnes v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CITY & CTY.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 17, 1980No. 79SA579PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This original proceeding was instituted by the Commissioner of Insurance (Commissioner) pursuant to C.A.R. 21. The Commissioner’s petition challenges the jurisdiction of the respondent district court which issued an order countermanding the Commissioner’s ruling pertaining to title insurance rates to be charged by Transamerica Title Insurance Company (Transamerica) and Pioneer National Title Insurance Company (Pioneer). We issued a rule to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted and stayed the district court’s order. We now discharge the rule as the issue in controversy is moot.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Crowe v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. People Ex Rel. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. District Court of the Second DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. FulenwiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Dempsey v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. Tippett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API