Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
{1 We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding that section 38-10-124(2), C.R.S. (2012) (Colorado's Credit Agreement Statute of Frauds, or "CASOF'), allows the introduction of extrinsic evidence to interpret an allegedly ambiguous contract. We reverse the court of appeals and conclude that the contract at issue is not ambiguous. Because we hold that the contract is not ambiguous, we do not reach the question of whether CASOF allows for the introduction of extrinsic evidence to resolve a facially ambiguous credit agreement.
I. Facts and Proceedings Below
1 2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Simon v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Philippe Calderon v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Laleh v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Laleh v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. StanleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.