Legal Opinion

Middlecoff v. Middlecoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1959No. Civ. 18071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendant and his guardian were ordered to pay plaintiff $175 per month support pending the determination of two appeals hereafter described, and $1,000 attorney’s fees and $300 costs on the second appeal. Defendant appeals from the order.

Questions Presented

1. Plaintiff’s right to attorney’s fees and costs.

2. Her right to alimony pendente lite.

3. Did the court abuse its discretion in the amounts awarded ?

4. Was the order requiring the guardian to pay proper?

Record

This is the third appeal taken by the husband in this merry-go-round of litigation. The parties were married February 25, 1939.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Martins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Niu v. McnamaraSuperior Court of Guam · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API