Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1977No. 14639Published

1Opinion of the Court

564 P.2d 1380 (1977)

Vera Arlene FERGUSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Lowell Gene FERGUSON, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14639.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 19, 1977.

Harold G. Christensen and Ellen Maycock, of Worsley, Snow & Christensen, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roger D. Sandack, of Sandack & Sandack, Salt Lake City, for defendant-respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice:

After annulment of her second marriage, plaintiff, Vera Arlene Ferguson, petitioned for reinstatement of alimony payments provided for in a divorce decree from her former husband, the defendant herein, which the latter had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Austad v. AustadUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Flaxman v. FlaxmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API