Legal Opinion
Wright v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2005No. 1:00-cv-06889PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DANIELS, District Judge.
This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas for a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Magistrate Judge Maas issued a Report wherein he recommended that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. In his Report, Magistrate Judge Maas advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report will constitute a waiver of those objections. Although plaintiff twice requested and was granted an extension of time to file objections to the Report, none of the parties…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Conway v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Nakis v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Drouillard v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Chevor Pompey v. County of Westchester, John Nonna, in his individual and professional capacity, and Bertina Capuano, in her individual and professional capacityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Gayles v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.