Legal Opinion
Ditko v. Fabiano Communications Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 24, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04442Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Stephen Ditko, No. CV-19-04442-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Fabiano Communications Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Fabiano Communications, Inc.’s 16 (“FabCom”) Motion to Strike (Doc. 41) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 17 (Doc. 30). Both matters are now fully briefed and no party has requested oral argument. 18 (Docs. 31, 39–40, 42–43.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant both 19 motions (Docs. 30, 41). 20 I. BACKGROUND 21…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.