Legal Opinion

Gilliken v. . Norcom

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Is an order of removal upon tbe ground tbat a party cannot secure a fair and impartial trial reviewable in tbe Supreme Court ?

Tbe plaintiff asked for removal of tbe cause under C. S., 471 and 472. Affidavits were filed in behalf of plaintiff, reciting in substance tbat tbe case bad been discussed generally in Carteret County to such an extent tbat “tbe whole population have formed or expressed an opinion one way or tbe other.” A large number of affidavits were filed in behalf of defendants, contradicting and controverting tbe affidavits filed by tbe plaintiff and asserting tbat a fair trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Garrett & Co. v. BearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Oettinger v. Hill Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Phillips v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Byrd v. Carolina Spruce Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Everett v. TOWN OF ROBERSONVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Patrick v. HurdleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API