Patrick v. Hurdle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeocic, J.
Removal of a case for a “fair trial” under the provisions of G.S. 1-84 is limited to removal to an adjoining county. Removal of a case “when the convenience of witnesses and ends of justice would be promoted” under the provisions of G.S. 1-83(2) is not limited to removal to an adjoining county.
Appellees state in their brief: “In any event, as far as the geography of the matter is concerned, Currituck and Pasquotank Counties seemingly adjoin in the Albemarle Sound.” However, it seems from Judge Parker’s order that plaintiffs and the Judge were doubtful that the two counties do adjoin, because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phillips v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Emery v. . HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Gilliken v. . NorcomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patrick v. HurdleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HaltomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Everett v. TOWN OF ROBERSONVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. Powell Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979