Oettinger v. Hill Live Stock Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at June Term, 1915, of Guileoed. Civil action. There was motion to remove, which was overruled. Also .judgment for plaintiff by default for want of answer’. Defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
This action is brought to recover from the defendant the sum of $743.19 with interest. In apt time, January Term, 1915, the defendant filed a motion, with affidavit, for removal of the cause to Franklin County. This motion was made under subsection 2, sec. 425, Revisal 1905. Plaintiff answered this motion and filed affidavit. Hearing on motion was at January Term, 1915. The motion for removal was denied. The defendant was given till the following Tuesday of the term to file additional affidavits. No additional affidavits were filed. No answer or demurrer was ever filed. At the request of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. SmarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Duffy v. A. & N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Ford v. Pigeon River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lassiter v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Causey v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Howard v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.