Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
Concurring opinion by Circuit Judge MILLETT.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
This petition follows our remand for application of the “benefits exception” to the general policy of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission against includ ing an acquisition premium in a pipeline’s rate base. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC (“Missouri P), 601 F.3d 581, 588 (D.C.Cir.2010). The Commission describes its benefits exception as allowing an acquisition premium to be included in a pipeline’s rate base when the purchase price is less than the cost of constructing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Midwest Iso Transmission Owners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Anr Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Rio Grande Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Michael Holland v. Bibeau Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Constellation Mystic Power v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- International Transmission Company v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- City of Lincoln v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020