People v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), dated October 21, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The People met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts that supported the defendant’s adjudication as a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Mabee, 69 AD3d 820 [2010]). Although the County Court failed to set forth the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. PietarnielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. BretanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BogertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.