W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
In this case we must decide whether the act of state doctrine bars a court in the United States from entertaining a cause of action that does not rest upon the asserted invalidity of an official act of a foreign sovereign, but that does require imputing to foreign officials an unlawful motivation (the obtaining of bribes) in the performance of such an official act.
I
The facts as alleged in respondent s complaint are as follows: In 1981, Harry Carpenter, who was then chairman of the board and chief executive officer of petitioner W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. (Kirkpatrick), learned that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Consolidated Development Corp. v. Sherritt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.