Maryland State Police v. Zeigler
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
Who would have believed that an impermissible classroom romance would give rise to this appeal in which we are called upon to decide, for the first time in the annals of Maryland administrative law, whether a fact-finding tribunal may adjourn for the purpose of receiving additional evidence once deliberations have commenced?
In other jurisdictions,
there is substantial support for the view that within the discretion of the trial court, the reopening of a civil case for the reception of additional evidence after it has been submitted and the jury have retired to deliberate on their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. OlsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Robert Lewis Eason and Kenneth Lamoyne Nowlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Abbott v. Administrative Hearing BoardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Dyson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Garbutt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993