Legal Opinion
Maryland State Police v. Zeigler
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 7, 1993No. 9, September Term, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
330 Md. 540 (1993)
625 A.2d 914
MARYLAND STATE POLICE
v.
JOHN M. ZEIGLER.
No. 9, September Term, 1991.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
June 7, 1993.
Diane Krejsa, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, argued and on brief (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baltimore and Betty A. Stemley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pikesville, on brief), for petitioner.
Byron L. Warnken and David L. Moore, Baltimore, argued, for respondent.
Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
The issue before us in this case is whether an administrative agency may reopen a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State Insurance Commissioner v. National Bureau of Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.