Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of Assessments
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Human nature being what it is, the average taxpayer wishes to purchase at the lowest possible cost and to be assessed for tax purposes at the lowest possible amount, but to sell for the highest dollar amount possible. Here appellant, Fairchild Hiller Corporation (Fairchild), is unhappy with the assessment on its real estate in Washington County. It does not wish to concede that it may have bought a bargain. Its appeal from the decision of the Maryland Tax Court was entered prior to the passage of Chapter 385 of the Acts of 1971 providing in what is now Code (1957, 1969 Repl. Vol., 1972 Supp.)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Insurance Commissioner v. National Bureau of Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Dal Maso v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Rogan v. Commrs. of Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Meade Heights, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bornstein v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Dickinson-Tidewater, Inc. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Supervisor of Assessments v. Asbury Methodist Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.