Legal Opinion
Huertas v. East River Housing Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 12, 1993No. 665, Docket 92-7848PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, housing corporations, appeal from an order entered in the Southern District of New York, Robert L. Carter, District Judge, requiring them to accept applications and to maintain a waiting list for apartments which were the subject of a housing discrimination action and a stipulated settlement. Appellants ceased accepting new applications just months after the settlement agreement went into effect. They claim that accepting applications is not a requirement of the settlement agreement, and that they are not violating the terms- of the agreement.
For the reasons…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Hartford v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Huertas v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cynthia R. Geller v. Branic International Realty Corp. And Hank S. FreidCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. PalmadessaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Hurley v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Bernstein Management Corp. v. Petker & Buran Fur Corp. (In Re Petker & Buran Fur Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Barcia v. SitkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.