Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Munoz

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1983No. 69114PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This is an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus which was submitted to this Court by the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1967).

Applicant was convicted of the offense of theft of services in Cause No. 8516 in the 24th Judicial District Court of Victoria County. The punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for 10 years.

Applicant contends the indictment under which he was convicted is fundamentally defective because it fails to allege an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte CharlesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ex Parte PoussonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Reger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yanes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Ex Parte MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Moallen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. DeVaughn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  5. De Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API