Yanes v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
Appellant David Yanes appeals his conviction for indecency with a child by exposure. See Tex. Pen.Code. Ann. § 21.11 (West 2003). Yanes asserts that the indictment did not allege the offense with sufficient certainty because it did not specifically name a child who was present when appellant exposed himself. Yanes urges such specificity is required both to assure fair notice and to prevent double jeopardy from subsequent prosecutions by other unnamed children who may have been present. We affirm Yanes’s conviction.
BACKGROUND
On August 16, 2001, Yanes was seen by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- DeVaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Geter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Briceno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mungin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Harris, Owen ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Ex Parte AmadorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Ryder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.