Legal Opinion

Gegere v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1928No. 26,789PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, a verdict having been returned for plaintiff.

Defendant is a common carrier, and part of its railroad system extends through the cities of Marinette and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Green Bay Junction is a stopping place less than a mile beyond the main station in Green Bay coming from Marinette. In the morning of November 30, 1925, plaintiff bought a ticket at Green Bay going from there to Marinette. Towards evening he procured a ticket at Marinette for the return passage and boarded the defendant’s train…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Palmer v. . Pennsylvania Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. McVeety v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Condran v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Ginn v. Forest Nursery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Fanelli v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  5. Morrison v. Pacific Northwest Public Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API