Legal Opinion

Altamaha Electric Membership Corp. v. Irvin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1962No. 39617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The special demurrer designated as special demurrer number 6 complains of the allegations of paragraphs 18 and 19 of the petition for the reason, as contended by defendant, that plaintiff is attempting to make a dual recovery for pain and suffering in that plaintiff is asking separate damages for mental and physical pain and suffering, whereas, defendant contends to permit mental and physical pain and suffering to be so separately pled would, in effect, allow plaintiff, if successful in the prosecution of said cause, to have a double recovery and would be contrary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Clinton v. Gunn-Willis Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Calbeck v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Lamar Electric Membership Corp. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Reighard v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API