Legal Opinion

Calbeck v. Herrington

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1930No. 7372PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. There is no misjoinder of parties defendant in a suit brought by a legatee and devisee against a person in her capacity as executrix and as an individual, for account and settlement with such legatee and devisee for her interest in the estate administered by such executrix, the executrix being a devisee under the will. The executrix in her individual capacity is a proper though not a necessary party.

2. In paragraph 8 of the petition it is alleged that the executrix collected a large amount of money from various sources, that she deposited over $11,000 in the Peoples Bank, which failed, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Thomas v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Morrison v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Ewing v. MosesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Robinson v. Georgia Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Benton v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. PardueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Rivers v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API