Legal Opinion
Gunderson v. Williams
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 28, 1928No. 26,607PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Taxpayer’s action to recover a judgment in favor of the defendant school district against its officers for the amount of salaries illegally paid them. The defendants demurred, the court sustained the demurrers, and the plaintiff appeals.
The defendant School District No. 9 in St. Louis county is a ten-town school district. Under the provisions of G. S. 1913, § 2719 (L. 1911, p. 189, c. 148, amended by L. 1913, p. 650, c. 445) the salary of officers in such school districts is fixed as follows:
“Two hundred dollars ($200) a year where such district contains thirty public schools; four hundred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Armour & Co. v. North DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. Cloudy & TraverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- In Re Taxes for 1961 on Real Estate Owned by Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Eldred v. Division of Employment and SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Board of Education v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.