Legal Opinion
State v. Cloudy & Traverse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 1924No. 23,821PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Judgment was entered in St. Louis county against the defendants for personal property taxes. They appeal from the judgment. Their objection is that it includes an 8/10 mill tax levy for school purposes pursuant to Laws 1921, p. 537, c. 357, entitled “An act to provide for county school tax levies in certain counties and for the apportionment and distribution of the same.” The ground of their objection is that the statute is unconstitutional as special legislation.
The Constitution provides that the legislature shall pass no special law “regulating the management of public schools, the building…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bosley v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smith ex rel. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Driscoll v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Board of Education v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. Delaware Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.