Legal Opinion
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 13, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-52; Court 03-00652PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. (together, “Hynix”) challenge the final affirmative material injury determination made by the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1671d(b) with respect to dynamic random access memory semiconductors of one megabit or above (“DRAMS”),- published under DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea, USITC Pub. 3616, Inv. No. 701-TA-431 (Aug. 2003) (Final). 1 Pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2, Hynix moves for judgment on the agency record.
Hynix submitted a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tropicana Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- JMC Steel Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Shandong Ttca Biochemistry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Siemens Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.