Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nolen v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, C. J.-

Original action in Mandamus. Relators were engaged in all kinds of drainage work. The case here stands upon the petition for our writ (to he taken as and for the alternative writ), and demurrer to the return, which in effect is a motion for judgment on the pleadings. As indicated by the style of the case, relators were doing business under the firm name of Capital Reclamation Company. They received from the Andrew-Nodaway Drainage District of Nodaway County, for engineering work, surveying and expenses, three several warrants, aggregating $1116.97. These warrants were dated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wiles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Andrew County ex rel. Kirtley v. SchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. Treasurer of Callaway CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Kusnetsky v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Layne-Western Co. v. Buchanan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API