Legal Opinion
Bateman v. City of West Bountiful
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1996No. 95-4041PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Wesley V. Bateman (“Bateman”) brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of West Bountiful (“City”), and its Mayor, Carl Johnson, asserting a Fifth Amendment takings claim, due process and equal protection violations, and an equitable estoppel claim under Utah law. The district court held that these claims were not ripe for adjudication because Bateman had neither received a final administrative determination concerning his property, nor had he sought and been denied just compensation from the City under Utah’s inverse condemnation procedure.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- John Corp. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Alto Eldorado Partnership v. County of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.