Legal Opinion

John Corp. v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2000No. 99-20010PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs-Appellants The John Corporation and U.S. Vanguard, Limited, Inc. appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice their claims against the City of Houston and Cherry Moving Company, Inc., arguing that the lower court erred in finding that each of their federal claims is either unripe or frivolous. Although we agree that an Eighth Amendment claim is frivolous and that the takings claim is unripe, we conclude that other claims are ripe, and therefore reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1995,…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Simi Investment Company Inc v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Severance v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API