Legal Opinion

United States v. Ennis Flowers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1990No. 89-1991PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Ennis Flowers, appeals from a conditional guilty plea to a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The plea followed the denial of a motion to suppress the cocaine that was seized from Flowers in an airport search. Flowers contends on appeal, as he did in his motion to suppress, that his fourth amendment rights were violated. Upon a review of the record made at the suppression hearing, we agree with the trial judge that no fourth amendment violation occurred.

I

On May 11, 1988, Flowers arrived at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on a flight…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Dock RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Marcus HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Danilo Baro (92-1501 93-1250) and Ramon Baro (92-1502 93-1250)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Gerald DotsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Jose B. BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API