Legal Opinion
United States v. Danilo Baro (92-1501 93-1250) and Ramon Baro (92-1502 93-1250)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1994No. 92-1501, 92-1502 and 93-1250PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Danilo Baro and Ramon Baro were convicted by a jury of unlawful distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Danilo Baro was also convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848. They now appeal, on numerous grounds, their convictions and the sentences imposed by the district court. For the following reasons, we uphold Danilo Baro’s and Ramon Baro’s convictions, but vacate their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Guido Riascos-Suarez A/K/A Kennedy Diuza-RiascosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- First of Michigan Corporation Michael Sobol v. Carlton Bramlet Dolores M. BramletCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Cortez AveryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.