Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 622 and 623 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mbnceb,

These are appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County affirming the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Plymouth Township (Board) denying Carol Elizabeth Campbell and Humble Oil and Refining Company (Humble) a variance and also denying Humble’s request for a declaration that the zoning classification applicable to the property in question here is invalid. We affirm.

It is well settled that where, as here, the lower court does not take additional testimony on appeal from the zoning board, but rather relies entirely on the record compiled…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Di Santo v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Filanowski v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Township of Haverford v. SpicaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Jenkintown Towing Service v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Dewald v. BD. OF ADJUST., CITY OF PGH.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Williams v. Salem TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Somerton Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API