Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Clinton Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to compel the conveyance by defendant to complainant of a tract of eighty acres in Clinton county, in specific performance of an alleged agreement.

The agreement on which relief is sought is averred to have been made in the spring of 1866, whereby it is claimed that defendant, who is complainant’s father, agreed, “inconsideration of the work already performed by your orator for the said defendant, and the money already paid to him *381by your orator, aud in consideration of the love and affection for your orator, he being the son of the said Eli Wright, defendant,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Roehl v. HaumesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Lamb v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Bourget v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API