Doe v. Sanger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the alleged excavating, carrying away, and converting to their own use by defendants of large quantities of silver-bearing ore belonging to plaintiff. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff; and defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
There is one main question in the case, which we will examine first, as the others are of comparatively little importance.
Plaintiff is the owner.of a ledge or lode location and mining claim known as the Oriental. A portion of *204this claim was sometimes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
- Mining Co. v. TarbetSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Tyler Mining Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
- Grant v. PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Batt v. StedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Price v. McIntoshDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1901