Legal Opinion

Holguin v. Lopez

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided October 28, 2008No. 2:07-mj-00436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Defendant Officer Oscar Robles’s (“Officer Robles”) “Local Rule CV-12 Motion to Dismiss,” filed on April 15, 2008, and Plaintiff Eduardo Holguin’s (“Holguin”) “Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support,” filed on April 28, 2008, in the above-captioned cause. After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Officer Robles’s Motion should be granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth below.

I.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Damon S. Bonneau, Jr. v. Richard CuellarDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
  2. Elizabeth Schultz v. Lindsey Ercole, DODistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API