Elizabeth Schultz v. Lindsey Ercole, DO
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ELIZABETH SCHULTZ, et al.; § Plaintiffs § § SA-21-CV-01043-XR -vs- § § LINDSEY ERCOLE, et al., § Defendants § § ORDER On this date, the Court considered Defendants Ercole, Mangold, and Hernandez’s motion to strike Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (ECF No. 30), Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 23, 25) and Defendants’ motions to stay discovery (ECF Nos. 31, 32). After careful consideration, the Court issues the following order. BACKGROUND I. Facts This is a § 1983 case stemming from…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.