Legal Opinion

Sergeant Co. v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 1978No. [No. 172, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The narrow question raised in this appeal concerns the adequacy of an exception, entered pursuant to Maryland Rule 554, to a trial judge’s refusal to grant a requested jury instruction submitted in the form of a written prayer. The Court of Special Appeals in an unreported opinion, The Sergeant Company, et al. v. Ronald W. Pickett, No. 452, September Term, 1977, decided December 27, 1977, held that the exception at issue here failed to comply with the dictates of the rule. We granted certiorari and now reverse.

The present appeal arises out of an action for breach of contract brought in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Exxon Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Jones v. Federal Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Bauman v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Bowman v. Wooleyhan Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Jacobs v. FlynnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Edmonds v. MurphyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API