In re McPhilamy
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN & DENYING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
[Resolving ECF No. 23, 21]
Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Congress’s enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) — specifically the hanging paragraph of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (the “hanging paragraph”)— creates two exceptions that limit a debtor’s right to cramdown certain claims in a chapter 13 plan. Often, it falls to the courts to determine if a particular claim falls within either of the hanging…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re VillarrealUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Evolve Fed. Credit Union v. Barragan-Flores (In re Barragan-Flores)District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018