Legal Opinion

In re McPhilamy

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 31, 2017No. CASE NO: 16-10238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN & DENYING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Resolving ECF No. 23, 21]

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Congress’s enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) — specifically the hanging paragraph of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (the “hanging paragraph”)— creates two exceptions that limit a debtor’s right to cramdown certain claims in a chapter 13 plan. Often, it falls to the courts to determine if a particular claim falls within either of the hanging…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re VillarrealUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  2. Evolve Fed. Credit Union v. Barragan-Flores (In re Barragan-Flores)District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API