Legal Opinion

In re Garza

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 15, 2017No. CASE NO: 16-70534PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION & DENYING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN

Resolving ECF Nos, 19, 28

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

It is well known that bankruptcy has two primary public policy objectives. The first is to promote equality of distribution among similarly situated creditors. The second is to afford the debtor a fresh economic start. These goals of distribution and a fresh start are sometimes referred to as the twin pillars of bankruptcy.1 Theoretically, the twin pillars…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MelendezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2019
  2. Miner v. JohnsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018
  3. AnnaLyn Nelson WhittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
  4. Anthony G. Perkins and Pamela A. PerkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
  5. Marlena Joy PizzoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API