Legal Opinion

Maher v. Ferracute Machine Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

At the trial in the circuit the court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the only question presented to us is whether upon the following state of facts a question of fact and not a question of law was presented.

*576The plaintiff, a machinist of experience, was employed by defendant company at his trade in defendant’s shop at Bridge-ton, where it conducted the business of manufacturing presses and sheet metal tools. While thus engaged the plaintiff was injured by the centre hole of a reamer abruptly leaving the centre point of the machine,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laragay v. East Jersey Pipe Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Carroll v. Tidewater Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Munroe v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API