Carroll v. Tidewater Oil Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In tort. On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Vroom, J.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff below against the defendant, the Tidewater Oil Company, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while in the employment of the said company. The plaintiff was a common laborer, and had not, up to the time of the accident, worked in any other capacity while in this employment.
With a number of other laborers he was ordered, on the day of the injury, to move a large iron punching machine some 'five hundred feet from the place where it lay into a new boiler shop. The work of moving was done…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Nord Deutscher Lloyd Steamship Co. v. IngebregstenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- O'Brien v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Curley v. HoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Van Steenburgh v. ThorntonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Currie v. New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Dunne v. Jersey City Galvanizing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Maher v. Ferracute Machine Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912