Legal Opinion

State v. Uran

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2008No. 20080111PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Luke Uran appealed from an order deferring imposition of sentence entered subsequent to his conditional guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia. On appeal, Uran argues the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence found during a search of his residence, contending the evidence was confiscated during an unlawful search which violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We affirm, holding the search was lawful as it was conducted following freely given consent, and did not exceed the scope of that consent.

I

[¶…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SabinashNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. GatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. PogueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. KaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. CasatelliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API