Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2016No. 20150277, 20150278PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] In consolidated appeals, Deven Schmidt appeals from district court orders deferring imposition of sentence after he conditionally pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia and conspiracy tó deliver a controlled substance. Schmidt argues the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence he claims was obtained in violation of his rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. We affirm, concluding the district court properly denied Schmidt’s motion to suppress evidence.

I

[¶ 2] In March 2014, a law officer served a misdemeanor bench warrant on…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. CassonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. City of Jamestown v. CasarezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API