Legal Opinion

Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 28, 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

935 A.2d 803 (2007)

396 N.J. Super. 545

Thomas and Karen JANICKY, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

POINT BAY FUEL, INC., and USF Insurance Company, Defendants, and

The Powderhorn Agency, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 30, 2007.

Decided November 28, 2007.

Thomas J. Burns, III, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Reed Smith, attorneys; Mr. Burns and M. Paige Berry, of counsel and on the brief).

Marc L. Dembling, Edison, argued the cause for respondents (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys; Mr. Dembling, of counsel and on the brief).

Maeve E. Cannon,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ReldanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. DiMarino v. WishkinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Tradesoft Technologies, Inc. v. Franklin Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Delbridge v. Jann Holding CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Prestige Health Group, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. SCC v. LopezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API