Legal Opinion

Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. Furman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 4, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

32 N.J. 199 (1960)

160 A.2d 265

TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CHANNEL LUMBER CO., A CORPORATION, INTERVENING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

DAVID D. FURMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 22, 1959.

Decided April 4, 1960.

Mr. John J. Clancy and Mr. David Stoffer argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Clancy and Hayden, attorneys; Mr. John J. Clancy, Mr. David Stoffer and Mr. Joseph M. Jacobs, of counsel).

Mr. Julius Stein argued the cause for intervening…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Masters-Jersey, Inc. v. MAYOR AND GENERAL COUNCIL OF PARAMUSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. United Hunters Assn. of NJ, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Conklin v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API