Legal Opinion

United Hunters Assn. of NJ, Inc. v. Adams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 12, 1962PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

Defendants challenge the judgment of the Appellate Division setting aside a regulation providing for a “hunter’s choice day” throughout the State. Because of the time factor, we directed argument upon the merits pending action upon the petition for certification, to the end that if the petition should be granted, a final disposition would be expedited.

The petition is hereby granted.

We are constrained to hold the Appellate Division departed from settled principles relating to judicial review of quasi- legislative actions of an administrative agency.

Followin…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. UNITED HUNTERS ASS'N, ETC. v. BontempoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Pappas v. MaloneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Newark v. Natural Resource Council in the Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Quaremba v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Heir v. DegnanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Glenwood Realty Co., Inc. v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. City of Passaic v. Botany MillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API