Legal Opinion
Conklin v. City of East Orange
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 13, 1977PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion o£ the court was delivered by
Sullivan, J.
This appeal involves the interplay between two statutes. The first is N. J. S. A. 34:15-43, a section of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, which makes the Act applicable to public employees but contains the following limitation :
“No former employee who has been retired on pension by reason of injury or disability shall be entitled under this section to compensation for such injury or disability; provided, however, that such employee, despite retirement, shall, nevertheless, be entitled to the medical, surgical and other treatment and hospital…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Application of Howard SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Leoni v. Tp. of HamiltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Conklin v. BD. TRUSTEES POLICE & FIRE. RET. SYSTNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Cattani v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, POLICE & FIREMEN'S RETIRE.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gerba v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREM. SYS.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Bunk v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- James v. Bd. of Trustees of PERSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Wright v. Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Szczepanik v. DEPT. OF TREASURYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.