State v. Click
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*613CAMPBELL, J.
In State v. DeMello, 300 Or 590, 716 P2d 732 (1986), this court held that a defendant charged with driving while suspended may not prevail on an affirmative defense based on his lack of notice of the suspension when the evidence revealed that the defendant received a pink slip informing him that the post office was holding a certified letter for him. The question in this case is which side has the burden of proving whether or not the defendant received a pink slip when an affirmative defense is raised. We agree with the trial court and the Court of Appeals that the burden is on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DeMelloOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ClickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RodarteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Belinskey v. ClootenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. Sanchez-CacatzunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.